We can help you buy or sell a residential or commercial property anywhere in Australia. Leasing contract services included.
ForumLaw provides legal services and contract work for any type of business transaction from business registration to succession matters.
We'll help make your project a success, from setting up & revising contracts and agreements to tracking sales & leases in multiple-strata unit projects online!
Choose a package that suits your needs. We then maintain constant legal watch of your business.
Take control of your assets today. Contact ForumLaw to arrange a new Will or review any existing arragements in place.
Stay in touch with how the law affects you! Subscribe to our
The NSW Court of Appeal, in Pavlovic v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd  NSWCA 313, has overturned a previous decision that discussions and correspondence between solicitors leading up to the Christmas holidays in 2014 to wind up a joint venture had created a binding contractual agreement on the solicitors’ clients.
In 2005 Mr Pavlovic and Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (“Universal”) entered into a joint venture agreement in relation to a music recording label, Moduar Recordings Pty Ltd (“Modular”). The joint venture was governed by a shareholder’s agreement and an executive services agreement.
In late September 2014, the parties indicated to each other that they wished to terminate the joint venture agreement. Negotiations between the solicitors for the parties resulted in a deed of release and settlement being drafted.
On 23 December 2014, Universal’s solicitors sent a draft proposed deed of release (“Proposed Deed”) to Mr Pavlovic’s solicitor, who responded by email at 2:36pm the next day, stating that Mr Pavlovic “will sign” the Proposed Deed. The final correspondence between the parties was from Universal’s solicitors allowing Mr Pavlovic “a further 48 hours to sign the documents and forward copies to us.”
Neither party sent an executed copy of the Proposed Deed to the other at that time. Universal also failed to send a cheque for $100.00 to Mr Pavlovic for the transfer of the shares in Modular, as was required by the Proposed Deed.
In the earlier proceedings the Court made orders on 22 July 2015 that the parties had entered into a binding agreement on 24 December 2014 on the terms of the Proposed Deed. The Court also held that universal’s solicitor’s 23 December 2014 email constituted an offer, and that this offer was accepted by Mr Pavlovic’s solicitor by way of his response at 2:36 pm the next day.
In his Appeal, Mr Pavlovic’s raised 2 principal issues:
In these recent proceedings, the Court found that the parties had not entered into a binding agreement and that Mr Pavlovic was not bound by the actions of his solicitor, for the following reasons:
This case is a strong reminder that the negotiation of contract terms must be absolutely clear about the point at which each party is considered to be bound by the agreement. The time that negotiations have ended and an agreement has been entered into should be clarified in writing to prevent potential difficulties further down the line.