We can help you buy or sell a residential or commercial property anywhere in Australia. Leasing contract services included.
ForumLaw provides legal services and contract work for any type of business transaction from business registration to succession matters.
We'll help make your project a success, from setting up & revising contracts and agreements to tracking sales & leases in multiple-strata unit projects online!
Choose a package that suits your needs. We then maintain constant legal watch of your business.
Take control of your assets today. Contact ForumLaw to arrange a new Will or review any existing arragements in place.
Stay in touch with how the law affects you! Subscribe to our
As we have discussed previously, there is more than one way to “skin a cat” or to bring a claim against the estate of a deceased person where the claimant believes they have missed out on an entitlement to a share of that estate.
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of NSW in Sedgwick v Varzonek  NSWSC 1275 involved the question of whether statements made by a deceased person could be said to have been “promissory” [promises] and to have created expectations upon which the Plaintiff could have reasonably relied upon. The Plaintiff brought proceedings in this case pursuant to section 57 of the Succession Act, for an order for financial provision out of the estate of the late Marlene Xenia Reis (“the Deceased”).
The Plaintiff knew the Deceased for around 9 years, during which the Deceased was being treated for a mental illness. The Plaintiff claimed that he was the de facto partner of the Deceased at the time of her death and as a result he was an ‘eligible person’ under the Act, and could make a claim for provision from the Deceased’s estate.
The Plaintiff’s alleged relationship with the Deceased was not found to be a de facto relationship or a close personal relationship for the purposes of being an “eligible person”.
The Plaintiff also made claims in contract and equitable estoppel in respect of statements allegedly made to the Plaintiff by the Deceased which the Plaintiff claimed to have relied upon. The Plaintiff alleged that the Deceased made a number of statements and promises to him during their relationship.
As the Court found that the Plaintiff had failed to establish that he was an eligible person under the Act, and he was neither in a de facto or close personal relationship with the Deceased at the time of her death, the Plaintiff’s claim in contract failed. His claim in equitable estoppel, namely his claim to be entitled to $200,000 from the proceeds of Deceased’s settlement of her personal injury proceedings, was successful.